Garmin Forerunner 970

— Show original

I took a risk and switched from a 30-year Polar customer to Garmin. The last Polar was the Vantage V2, which is where I'm reflecting my experience. Now, after a couple of weeks of use, here are my thoughts: A bright, easy-to-read display. The GPS signal is found well and has worked well even in "dead forest". The wrist heart rate measurement works well and logically, at least when running and cycling. The watch gives you a lot of data, much of which is unnecessary for me. There are plenty of features and customization, but the menus feel very cumbersome after Polar. The instructions are also confusing. Luckily, Youtube is full of user videos, otherwise I would have completely lost my nerve :) As a small note, the strangeness of the turns, for example, does the timer start when the exercise starts!? (For me, the timer is something other than time running upwards). I'm also not used to running at a pace (min/km) - pace or speed would be more logical. Nor was orienteering found in the ready-made sport profiles - strange, when there is paragliding, etc. You can add sport profiles yourself, as long as you first watch on Youtube how to do that:) So the above mentioned are just small oddities for me as a new Garmin user. In summary, however, I can say that the impression is high-quality and as user experience increases, the logic of using the watch will probably be found. The whole thing is strongly on the plus side, so I can recommend it. After the difficulties of implementation, I have not regretted switching from Polaris to Garmin.

— Show original

My 2 weeks of use have been very positive. The GPS has worked flawlessly and very reliably. Long battery life. Easy to use. Strong recommendation!

— Show original

It is clearly heavier than the 630 model, but to compensate, the measurement features and appearance have improved. The display is significantly brighter, so it is easier to monitor your heart rate - on the other hand, in winter, even when skiing, it can be a little challenging to put on gloves in severe frosts, but that is why heart rate belts were invented and the watch can be put in your pocket.

— Show original

The watch has been a worthwhile investment, it gives a lot of good data which motivates you to move, makes it easier to monitor your recovery and makes it easier to develop your own running. In addition, it has very accurate sensors to read the values. Especially when connected to the HRM-600 heart rate belt, it gives really good data for running, with it I was able to quickly improve my running technique after a break of several years.

— Show original

The watch has completely met my expectations. The heart rate measurement works surprisingly well, even during workouts where the heart rate fluctuates a lot. The flashlight is also very useful. The only minus is the frame, which has small scratches.

— Show original

I am really satisfied. Satellites are found immediately and the exercises are going well. The battery life is really good.

— Show original

Pros: High-quality heart rate monitor. Lots of functions. Bright and large display. Lightweight. Many indicators to monitor progress. You can increase the text size! Cons: Confusing menus. Small delays.

— Show original

A proven watch for running and cycling training.

— Show original

5/5 the best sports watch you can get for the money.

— Show original

After much consideration, I chose the 970. Excellent choice – I don't regret my decision.